There is one aspect of ADHD that I
rarely hear discussed, and yet I increasingly suspect that it may be one of the
most painful parts of the entire experience.
When people talk about ADHD, they
usually focus on the symptoms themselves. They talk about distractibility,
impulsivity, forgetfulness, disorganization, procrastination, emotional
regulation, and a host of other challenges that are now reasonably well understood.
These symptoms are certainly real, and they can create significant difficulties
throughout a person’s life.
What I find myself thinking about more
and more, however, is not the symptoms themselves but what happens after other
people begin reacting to those symptoms.
Long before a child with ADHD
understands what ADHD is, other people are already forming opinions. Parents
form opinions. Teachers form opinions. Classmates form opinions. Extended
family members form opinions. Eventually employers, partners, and friends form
opinions as well.
This process is completely
understandable. Human beings are pattern-recognition machines. We observe
behaviour and attempt to explain it. In many situations this serves us well. It
allows us to make predictions about the world and about one another. The problem
is that ADHD presents a very unusual challenge because much of what is
happening is invisible.
People can see the forgotten homework
assignment.
They cannot see the hour spent staring
at it while desperately trying to begin.
People can see the missed appointment.
They cannot see the twenty times the
person remembered it before finally forgetting.
People can see the emotional outburst.
They cannot see the years of
frustration, confusion, and repeated failure that may have preceded it.
In other words, people observe the
outcome but rarely have access to the process.
Unfortunately, human beings do not
like incomplete explanations. When information is missing, we naturally fill in
the blanks.
The child who forgets things becomes
careless.
The teenager who cannot stay organized
becomes irresponsible.
The adult who struggles with paperwork
becomes lazy.
The student who cannot sustain effort
becomes unmotivated.
The employee who misses details
becomes unreliable.
These conclusions are rarely formed
out of cruelty. Most people are simply trying to make sense of what they are
seeing.
The tragedy is that while the
observations may be accurate, the explanations often are not.
Over time, these explanations
accumulate. They begin to form a story. Eventually that story becomes a
reputation.
This is where I believe something
particularly painful begins to happen.
A reputation has tremendous inertia.
Once people think they know who you are, every future event tends to be
interpreted through that existing framework. The person who has developed a
reputation for being unreliable may complete dozens of tasks successfully
without much notice. Then one mistake occurs, and suddenly everyone says,
“There it is again.”
The mistake confirms the reputation.
The successes are treated as
exceptions.
The reputation becomes
self-reinforcing.
I have come to think of this as a
reputation trap.
The person with ADHD finds themselves
trapped inside a story that was written about them years earlier. Sometimes the
story contains elements of truth. In fact, that is what makes it so persuasive.
The person really did forget things. They really did struggle. They really did
make mistakes.
The problem is that the meaning
attached to those mistakes may be fundamentally wrong.
What makes this especially difficult
is that the person with ADHD is often in a poor position to defend themselves.
Not because they lack intelligence or insight, but because much of the evidence
they would need to present is invisible.
How do you prove effort?
How do you prove exhaustion?
How do you prove that a task required
four times as much energy for you as it appeared to require from the outside?
How do you prove that you care deeply
about something when your behaviour repeatedly suggests otherwise?
These are extraordinarily difficult
things to demonstrate.
As a result, many people with ADHD
spend years trying to argue against a reputation while simultaneously producing
evidence that seems to support it.
The harder they try, the more
frustrated they become.
The more frustrated they become, the
more emotional they appear.
The more emotional they appear, the
less seriously they are taken.
Eventually many people stop arguing
altogether.
At some point, something even more
damaging can occur.
The external reputation becomes an
internal identity.
After hearing the same explanations
long enough, a person may begin to adopt them as their own. The child who is
repeatedly told they are lazy begins to wonder whether they are lazy. The
teenager who is constantly criticized for inconsistency begins to wonder
whether they are fundamentally flawed. The adult who has spent decades
disappointing people begins to assume that disappointment is simply what they
bring into the world.
What began as a misunderstanding
gradually becomes a self-concept.
This, in my opinion, is where some of
the deepest suffering associated with ADHD may reside.
The symptoms create challenges,
certainly. But the social interpretation of those symptoms can create something
far more enduring. A forgotten homework assignment lasts a day. A missed
deadline lasts a week. A poor report card lasts a semester.
A reputation can last a lifetime.
I want to be very clear about
something. I do not believe this happens because people are malicious. In fact,
I think most of the people who participated in creating these reputations were
doing the best they could with the information available to them.
I understand why it happens.
What I am less willing to accept now
is the idea that understanding why it happens somehow removes the cost.
Because someone pays that cost.
The person carrying the reputation
pays that cost.
The person who spends years feeling
defective pays that cost.
The person who begins apologizing for
themselves before they even speak pays that cost.
The person who slowly loses trust in
their own experience pays that cost.
And perhaps most painfully of all, the
person who begins believing the story pays that cost.
For much of my life I believed that if
I could simply explain myself better, perform better, try harder, or achieve
enough success, people would eventually revise their opinion of me.
What I have slowly come to realize is
that reputations do not change nearly as quickly as reality.
Sometimes the story survives long
after the evidence has changed.
Sometimes the person has changed while
the reputation remains frozen in time.
And sometimes the most important work
is not convincing everyone else that they were wrong.
Sometimes the most important work is
recognizing that the story handed to you and the person you actually are may
not be the same thing.

No comments:
Post a Comment